How to Build an App Like Wix: Developer’s Guide to a Powerful Website Builder Clone

If you’ve ever wondered what it takes to build an app like Wix, let me walk you through it — not from a high-level business pitch, but from the ground up, as someone who’s actually architected and coded a Wix clone from scratch. Think of this post as a behind-the-scenes breakdown of everything from tech stack choices to feature implementations, and yes, the gotchas too.

Wix has become the go-to for drag-and-drop website building, serving non-tech users who want full control without writing a line of code. So naturally, if you’re a founder or agency planning to launch a Wix clone, the opportunity is wide open — especially in regional markets, niche communities, or industry-specific verticals (think real estate, education, or food delivery websites).

Let’s dive into how we approached building this — and how you can choose between a JavaScript full-stack (React + Node.js) or a PHP stack (Laravel/CodeIgniter) depending on your team, speed, and vision.

Tech Stack: Choosing Between JavaScript (Node.js) and PHP (Laravel/CodeIgniter)

When we set out to build the Wix clone, one of the first questions was: Which stack should we use? We actually built two versions — one using Node.js + React and another using PHP with Laravel — to support clients with different in-house capabilities. Here’s how we approached the decision.

JavaScript Stack (Node.js + React)

If you’re looking for a modern, component-based UI with real-time collaboration (think Figma-style drag/drop), React is the clear winner. We paired it with Node.js for the backend, using Express for RESTful APIs and WebSocket for live preview features. MongoDB was our go-to database for its flexibility (more on that later).Node’s event-driven model made real-time saving, autosuggest, and component-based template reuse incredibly smooth. Plus, if your team already knows JavaScript, it’s an end-to-end advantage: same language across frontend and backend.

PHP Stack (Laravel or CodeIgniter)

Laravel is our default for teams wanting battle-tested backend structure with clean syntax, route management, and baked-in security features. If your app is content-heavy and admin-first (less real-time interaction), Laravel shines. For lightweight use cases or rapid prototyping, we used CodeIgniter — its simplicity helped us move fast. We built the frontend using Blade templates or integrated Vue.js for interactivity, depending on the feature scope.

When to Pick Which

Choose the JavaScript stack if:

• You need a modern UI with draggable components, theme editors, or real-time previews
• You want a headless architecture for mobile/web parity
• Your dev team already works with React or React Native

Choose the PHP stack if:

• Your audience is content-driven or SEO-focused
• You want to launch fast with Laravel’s out-of-the-box features
• You need simpler hosting and database requirements

Whichever stack you choose, make sure it’s aligned with your target user’s behavior — designers love real-time tools, while businesses may prefer stability over flexibility

Read More : How to Build a Wix Clone in 2025 

Database Design: Flexible, Scalable, and Built for Creative Freedom

No matter what stack you use, your database design can make or break the flexibility of your Wix clone. Since users will be building custom pages with blocks, media, forms, and themes, we needed a structure that supports nested, dynamic content, but also keeps performance in check.

MongoDB for JavaScript Stack

For the Node.js + React setup, MongoDB was a natural fit. Its document-based structure allowed us to store flexible page layouts with components like text blocks, image widgets, carousels, and buttons — all in a single nested schema.Here’s a simplified schema for a website page:

{
  _id: ObjectId,
  userId: ObjectId,
  title: "Home Page",
  slug: "home",
  components: [
    {
      type: "hero",
      props: {
        heading: "Welcome!",
        subtext: "Start your business online",
        backgroundImage: "/images/hero.jpg"
      }
    },
    {
      type: "features",
      props: {
        items: [{ icon: "star", text: "Easy setup" }, ...]
      }
    }
  ],
  seo: {
    metaTitle: "Home | MySite",
    metaDescription: "Create your website easily"
  },
  updatedAt: ISODate
}

This setup gave us total flexibility — users could add unlimited blocks, reorder them, and store all page settings in one place. Indexes on userId and slug helped with quick retrieval.

MySQL for PHP Stack

In Laravel/CodeIgniter, we opted for MySQL with a more normalized structure. Each component (text block, image section, form) was stored in a separate table and linked via a page_components pivot table. Here’s how we broke it down:

• pages: Holds page-level data like title, slug, and owner
• components: Stores reusable block types (like header, gallery, contact form)
• page_components: Stores component order and specific settings (as JSON)
• themes: Global styles, colors, and typography per user or site

We used Laravel’s Eloquent relationships to stitch everything together cleanly. The downside? Slightly more complex queries for page rendering. But the upside was granular control, which clients in regulated industries appreciated.

Both database approaches supported multi-user, multi-site systems with tiered pricing. We also kept versioning in mind — so every publish action creates a version checkpoint for rollback or preview.

Read More : Best Wix Clone Scripts in 2025: Features & Pricing Compared

Key Modules & Features: The Core of App Like Wix Experience

Once the database was set, the real work began — building the actual tools users need to design, manage, and launch websites. Here’s how we tackled the essential modules across both JavaScript and PHP stacks.

1. Drag-and-Drop Website Editor

JavaScript (React + Node.js)
We used React DnD and Framer Motion to enable smooth drag-and-drop experiences. Each block (e.g., Header, Gallery, Contact Form) was a React component with editable props. The structure was managed in a central Redux store and persisted to MongoDB in real time. We added an autosave feature using debounce() to reduce backend load.

PHP (Laravel + Blade/Vue)
In Laravel, we offered a component selection UI built with Vue.js, embedded within Blade templates. Instead of live drag-drop, it was more like “Add Block” and reorder with up/down buttons. This simplified the DOM complexity and suited non-tech admin users better. Data was passed via AJAX and saved through Laravel controllers.

2. Theme & Template Management

We designed a global theme layer with font choices, color palettes, and layout rules.

• In React, we used Context API for theme data injection
• In Laravel, we stored theme configs in JSON and used Blade directives to reflect choices
  Templates were versioned — users could start with a ready-made template and customize it block-by-block without altering the original. We supported template duplication, A/B drafts, and reset-to-default functionality.

3. Website Publishing & Routing

Node.js version used server-side rendering (SSR) with React Router and Next.js for SEO-friendly public pages. Routes were dynamically mapped from the slug in MongoDB. We also generated static JSON files for CDN caching.

Laravel used route wildcarding (Route::get('/{slug}')) with controller logic to fetch and render the page dynamically. We cached views with Laravel’s view()->composer and stored rendered HTML when possible for speed.

4. Admin Panel for Listings & Site Management

We built a multi-role admin backend:

• Superadmin: Manage users, templates, site limits
• Site Owner: Build pages, manage media, see analytics
• Client Users: Invite team, update content only

React: Used Ant Design and Redux Toolkit for fast state management and tables.
Laravel: Used Laravel Nova or custom Blade layouts with Livewire to support reactive elements.

5. Media Management & Hosting

Users uploaded images and documents to AWS S3 (or local storage for dev mode).

• Node.js handled it via multer-s3 middleware
• Laravel used Storage::disk('s3') abstraction
  All assets were CDN-linked and automatically compressed using TinyPNG APIs post-upload.

6. SEO Settings, Metadata, and Sitemap

Each page came with editable SEO metadata, OpenGraph tags, and toggleable index/noindex options.
We also auto-generated XML sitemaps and robots.txt based on public pages. Laravel handled it via Artisan commands and Node used a CRON script running via PM2.

All these features were modular — clients could disable certain modules like eCommerce or blogging depending on their plan.

Read our complete guide on how to hire the best Wix clone developer to build a feature-rich, user-friendly website builder platform

Data Handling: Third-Party APIs vs Manual Content Management

Every Wix-like builder needs to serve a variety of content blocks — galleries, forms, calendars, product listings, maybe even bookings. So we architected our Wix clone to support both API-fed data and manually entered content via admin panels.

Manual Listings via Admin Panel

In both stacks, we made sure non-technical users could manage their own content — think real estate agents adding property pages, or restaurants uploading menus.

JavaScript (React + Node.js)

• React forms powered all manual entries: users could add new content blocks like testimonials, pricing tables, contact forms using a modular interface
• We used Formik + Yup for form validation, and stored block data in MongoDB as nested JSON under each page
• Node.js API routes handled create, update, and delete operations, structured via Express controllers

PHP (Laravel or CodeIgniter)

• Laravel forms were rendered using Blade, with optional AJAX-based saves via Livewire
• Models like Listing, Gallery, or Testimonial were stored in MySQL, associated with the owning user/site
• We implemented basic CRUD with Laravel Resource Controllers and validation using FormRequest classes
  For CodeIgniter, we manually built the controller and validation logic but kept it lightweight to preserve performance.

Integrating External APIs

Depending on client use cases, we sometimes pulled live content from third-party APIs — event listings, hotel data, or stock tickers. Here’s how we approached this:

Node.js

• Used axios or node-fetch to pull data from APIs like Unsplash, Google Places, or Amadeus
• Created a proxy route to fetch external data and normalize it into the app’s structure
• Example: /api/external/unsplash?q=city would fetch images and map them to a block structure with captions and alt tags

Laravel

• We used Laravel’s HTTP client (based on Guzzle) to call APIs
• Responses were cached using Cache::remember() to avoid rate-limiting issues
• Example: an Amadeus integration cached flight offers by route and date, updating every 6 hours via Artisan scheduler

Both stacks supported toggling between “Live API Mode” and “Manual Entry Mode” — a must-have for platforms that serve both static business pages and dynamic product feeds.

We also built importers for CSV/Excel so admins could bulk upload their listings or migrate from other tools like WordPress or Webflow.

Read More : Pre-launch vs Post-launch Marketing for Wix Clone Startups

API Integration: Building the Backbone of a Modular Website Builder

APIs are the glue that hold the frontend and backend together in a Wix clone — whether you’re dynamically rendering pages, managing templates, or saving user preferences. We took a REST-first approach with both stacks, focusing on clean versioning, modular endpoints, and secure token-based access.

Core API Endpoints

We designed our endpoints around core resources like pages, components, templates, media, and users. Here’s a quick snapshot:

• GET /api/pages/:slug – Fetch a published page layout
• POST /api/pages – Create a new page with blocks
• PUT /api/pages/:id – Update content or metadata
• GET /api/templates – List available templates
• POST /api/upload – Handle media uploads
• POST /api/auth/login – Authenticate users

JavaScript Stack: Node.js + Express

In our Node.js app, we used Express.js for routing and middleware layers.
We structured APIs with versioning (/api/v1/) and included JWT token checks via express-jwt.

// Example: Save Page Block
router.put('/pages/:id', authenticateToken, async (req, res) => {
  const { components, seo } = req.body
  await Page.updateOne({ _id: req.params.id, userId: req.user.id }, { components, seo })
  res.send({ success: true })
})

We used cors, helmet, and rate-limit middleware to lock down access and avoid abuse.
Frontend used axios with interceptors for token management and error display.

PHP Stack: Laravel or CodeIgniter

In Laravel, we structured our API using routes/api.php with API Resources for formatting responses cleanly.

// routes/api.php
Route::middleware('auth:sanctum')->group(function () {
    Route::get('/pages/{slug}', [PageController::class, 'show']);
    Route::put('/pages/{id}', [PageController::class, 'update']);
});

We leveraged Laravel Sanctum for token-based authentication and rate-limiting via ThrottleRequests.
For CodeIgniter, we used the REST_Controller library and custom middleware for authentication and validation.

Across both stacks, we documented our APIs with Swagger (for Node.js) and Laravel API Doc Generator so internal teams and external partners could integrate easily. We also added support for webhooks on publish events — so platforms could trigger external builds or analytics sync when a user publishes a page.

Discover how much it costs to create a Wix-style website builder and how to maximize your budget for long-term profitability.

Frontend & UI Structure: Clean, Responsive, and Component-Based

The UI of a Wix-like app is everything — it’s where your users spend the most time and decide whether to stay or churn. We approached the frontend as a fully modular system, designed for performance, usability, and flexibility.

React Frontend (JavaScript Stack)

We used React (with hooks and Context API) to build the drag-and-drop editor and the live preview system.
Every section — hero, gallery, contact form, pricing table — was a standalone component with its own props and editable state.
We implemented a global layout shell with dynamic routing using React Router and used TailwindCSS for styling.
Responsiveness was handled via a mobile-first design strategy, with each block supporting flex, grid, and media queries to adapt layout dynamically.

Pages were rendered in two ways:

• Edit Mode: Components were wrapped with resizers, drag handles, and config panels using React DnD
• View Mode: Components rendered clean and minimal HTML output optimized for SEO and speed

We used Skeleton loaders and lazy-loaded blocks for better performance. Images were served via Cloudinary or S3 with adaptive sizes.

Blade Templates & Vue.js (PHP Stack)

In the Laravel version, we used Blade templating to render the initial layout and embedded Vue.js components where interactivity was needed — like adding blocks, editing text, or previewing layout changes.
Each block was a Blade partial with dynamic data injected from the controller. Styling was done using Bootstrap or Tailwind, depending on project preference.

Example: A Hero Section in Blade

<section class="hero" style="background-image: url('{{ $hero->background }}')">
  <div class="container">
    <h1>{{ $hero->title }}</h1>
    <p>{{ $hero->subtitle }}</p>
  </div>
</section>

Vue.js handled dynamic features like block sorting, live text editing, and media uploads. Axios was used for AJAX calls to Laravel APIs.

We ensured responsiveness with standard Bootstrap grid classes, custom media queries, and Blade conditionals to toggle layout structures.

Both stacks prioritized accessibility (WCAG 2.1) and performance — Core Web Vitals were always in check, with lazy-loading, optimized images, and minimal JS/CSS bundles.

Read More : Wix Features List: Everything You Need to Know Before Building Your Own Website Platform

Authentication & Payments: Secure Logins and Subscription-Ready Billing

A builder like Wix isn’t just about pages — it’s also about users, roles, and revenue. We built robust authentication systems and integrated flexible payment workflows to support everything from free trials to premium tiers.

Authentication Flow

JavaScript Stack (Node.js + React)
We used JWT (JSON Web Tokens) for stateless authentication. On login or signup, users received a token that was stored in localStorage and attached to every API request via an Axios interceptor.

• Signup/Login: POST /api/auth/register and POST /api/auth/login
• Token handling: Authorization: Bearer <token> in headers
• Protected routes: Middleware checked and verified JWT before allowing access

We supported multiple roles (admin, editor, viewer) and enforced permission checks on both backend routes and frontend components using React Context.

PHP Stack (Laravel + Sanctum)
Laravel Sanctum offered token-based authentication out of the box.
On login, we issued a token using auth()->user()->createToken('token-name') and stored it in localStorage or a secure cookie depending on the frontend.

Blade and Vue components respected roles using @can directives or API-driven permission checks.

OAuth & Social Logins

We added Google and Facebook login support using:

• passport-google-oauth20 in Node.js
• Laravel Socialite in PHP
  Tokens were mapped to user accounts with fallback to email verification for first-time logins.

Payments & Subscriptions

Stripe Integration
We used Stripe for subscription billing with support for multiple pricing tiers:

• Free trial
• Monthly/Annual plans
• Pay-per-feature add-ons

JavaScript Stack
Stripe Elements powered the frontend checkout. We hit /api/billing/subscribe and used the Stripe SDK to generate secure payment intents.
Webhook routes in Node.js listened for invoice.paid, subscription.updated, and customer.deleted to sync billing data.

PHP Stack
Laravel Cashier made it straightforward — we tied users to Stripe customers and allowed plan upgrades/downgrades via user->newSubscription('default', 'plan_id').
Webhooks were configured in routes/web.php using Cashier::webhooks() for syncing subscription status.

We also integrated Razorpay for Indian clients who preferred UPI and local card options, using the respective SDKs and a similar webhook-based sync mechanism.

Security-wise, we enforced HTTPS across all pages and used CSRF tokens (built-in with Laravel) or custom middleware in Express to prevent session hijacking.

Read More : Top 5 Mistakes Startups Make When Building a Wix Clone

Testing & Deployment: From Dev to Production Without Headaches

Shipping a Wix-like app isn’t just about writing great code — it’s about making sure your app runs reliably under real-world pressure. We implemented robust testing, Dockerized environments, and automated deployment pipelines to ensure smooth scaling and faster release cycles.

Automated Testing Strategy

JavaScript Stack (Node.js + React)

• Frontend Testing: We used Jest with React Testing Library to test components — layout blocks, form inputs, and UI actions
• Backend Testing: Mocha and Chai handled unit and integration tests across Express routes and services
• End-to-End (E2E): Cypress simulated full user journeys like creating a website, changing themes, and publishing a page
• Mocking APIs: We stubbed third-party APIs (like Stripe, Amadeus) using tools like nock to simulate edge cases

PHP Stack (Laravel)

• Unit Tests: Laravel’s built-in php artisan test handled model and controller tests
• Feature Tests: We simulated user behavior like form submissions, page edits, and uploads using Laravel’s HTTP test methods
• Database Migrations: Used RefreshDatabase trait in PHPUnit to isolate each test run with clean data
  We used Factories to quickly generate fake users, pages, and templates.

Docker & Environment Configs

For both stacks, we containerized the app using Docker, ensuring consistent dev-to-prod environments.
We used multi-stage Dockerfiles:

• Build stage (Node/Laravel dependencies, assets)
• Runtime stage (Nginx + Node or Apache + PHP)

Key Docker Elements:

• docker-compose.yml managed app, database, Redis, and queue workers
• Volume mounts enabled hot reload in development
• Separate .env files handled local vs staging vs production secrets

We also used .dockerignore to avoid bloated images and included health checks for containers.

CI/CD Pipelines

We deployed using GitHub Actions and GitLab CI (depending on the client).
Each push to main triggered:

1. Lint + Unit Tests
2. Docker Image Build
3. Push to Container Registry
4. Deploy to server (via SSH or Kubernetes)

Node.js: PM2 handled process management, log rotation, and crash recovery
Laravel: We used Supervisor + Artisan Queue workers and managed background jobs like email, webhook handling, and image optimization

CDN + Cache: We integrated Cloudflare for DNS, SSL, and edge caching of static pages
Database Backups: Daily backups via cron jobs and versioned snapshotting for rollback support

Deployment was zero-downtime by default. For Laravel, we used Envoyer for atomic deploys with rollbacks.

Pro Tips: Real-World Lessons for Speed, Scale & Usability

Building a Wix clone taught us a lot — not just about code, but about how real users interact with drag-and-drop builders, what breaks under load, and where you can cut corners (or absolutely shouldn’t). Here’s what I’d share with any founder or dev team planning to launch their own site builder.

1. Don’t Skip Caching

Your page builder might feel lightweight at first, but once users start designing pages with 20+ components, dynamic preview gets heavy.
In Node.js, we used Redis to cache page structures and theme settings keyed by userId and slug.
In Laravel, we cached rendered HTML for published pages and refreshed it only when content changed. Laravel’s rememberForever() + tag-based invalidation was a huge help.

2. Go Mobile-First From Day One

Drag-and-drop on desktop is easy to imagine — but mobile responsiveness needs real thought.
We used a column-based layout system with CSS grid and media queries to auto-adjust blocks.
Also, make sure your preview and live editor work on tablets — many clients used iPads for edits.

3. Rate-Limit and Sanitize Everything

Whether it’s saving a page or uploading media, throttle API calls and sanitize user inputs.
We added express-rate-limit middleware and schema validation via Joi in Node.js.
In Laravel, throttle middleware and Request classes handled this out of the box.
XSS is a real concern when users add raw HTML — we used DOMPurify (JS) and strip_tags() (PHP) with allowlists.

4. Real-Time Saves Need Debounce and Retry Logic

Autosave feels magical until it overloads your server. We used a 500ms debounce with status indicators (“Saving…”, “Saved”) and added retry logic to sync changes in case of network failures.
Don’t save everything instantly — batch block changes and send deltas, not full payloads.

5. Think in Blocks, Not Pages

The best decision we made was treating everything as reusable blocks — not monolithic pages. This made it easier to:

• Clone sections
• Roll back drafts
• Enable white-labeled templates
• Sync updates across pages using master blocks

This abstraction also made internationalization, accessibility, and analytics much more manageable.

Final Thoughts: Build from Scratch or Start with a Clone?

Looking back, building a Wix clone from scratch was both exciting and intense. It gave us complete control, but also came with hundreds of micro-decisions — from schema flexibility to theme logic to edge case handling. If you’ve got a solid dev team, time to test and iterate, and a long-term product vision, go custom. You’ll build exactly what your users need, tailored to your niche.

But here’s the thing most founders learn too late: launching fast matters. Your competitor isn’t waiting. That’s where a ready-made Wix clone can give you a massive head start. You still get flexibility (change the stack, reskin the frontend, inject new APIs), but you skip months of foundational engineering. That means more time for user feedback, marketing, and revenue.

At Miracuves, we’ve put in the engineering effort so you don’t have to start from zero. Our Wix Clone is available in both JavaScript (Node.js + React) and PHP (Laravel/CodeIgniter), supports both API-fed and manually curated content, includes drag-and-drop editors, subscription payments, SEO controls, and is already optimized for scale.

So whether you want to launch a niche website builder for freelancers, schools, restaurants, or wedding planners — you can get to market in weeks, not months.

FAQs: Founders’ Most Asked Questions About Wix Clone Development

Related Articles

• How to Build an App Like ChatGPT: Developer Guide
• How to Build an App Like Google Drive — A Developer’s Guide
• How to Build an App Like Mailchimp – A Developer’s Guide