Real Apps for Real Clients.
Real engagements. Named clients. Production code you can inspect.
A named client. A real problem. A measurable outcome. Every case study below is a real Miracuves engagement — production apps shipped to real businesses, written up with the client's permission. Source-code handover on every engagement, no exceptions.
Request Source-Code AccessServed
Nine thousand projects. Eighty-four you can read.
Worth being straight about the gap, because it is the first question a serious buyer asks.
Projects delivered
Since 2010, across more than thirty-five sectors. Every figure we publish is defined on the facts page and open to check.
Apps published
Live on the App Store and Play Store under our clients' own brands. A published app is a harder claim than a delivered project, which is why we count it separately.
Documented case studies
The ones with a named client, a published testimonial and permission to show the work. That is the constraint on this page - not the volume of work, but what we are allowed to name.
Most of our work sits behind an NDA, and a large share of it is white-label - the client's brand on the storefront, ours nowhere. We deliberately kept NDA engagements out of this archive entirely rather than describing them vaguely. So read the eighty-four as a sample of what we build and how we write it up, not as the extent of it.
Named, and checkable.
Forty-eight client marks, every one from a delivered engagement we have permission to name. That is the honest constraint on a page like this: not how much we have built, but how much of it we are allowed to show. No stock logos, no borrowed enterprise names, no "trusted by" filler.
Several of these clients commissioned a second and third platform, which is the part further down the page.
Four builds worth reading end to end.
Chosen from the eighty-four because the client put numbers to the outcome. Every figure below carries their name against it.
These are post-launch business outcomes, not delivery times. Our build is six working days on a ready-made base and two to eight weeks custom; a client’s own launch date also covers their gateway onboarding, store review, branding and compliance sign-off, which sit with them. The delivery figures are defined here.
Cameo Clone - a personalised video platform
Creators record and sell personalised video messages, with payouts and scheduling handled in-app. Built on our Cameo base, then extended for African-diaspora talent and multi-currency payouts.
Read the build80 creators onboarded on day one
Adelek Adrian · Kroon LLC10,000+ paid bookings in the first quarter
Adelek Adrian · Kroon LLCAnnurax ExchangeBinance Clone
Binance Clone - a crypto exchange
Spot trading, custody and settlement on our exchange base, hardened for the client’s own compliance regime. Order matching, wallets and KYC shipped as one platform.
Read the buildZero settlement incidents in six months
Anton Barbaro · Annurax ExchangeMyQif (QifQif)Custom build
Custom build - a personal-finance aggregation platform
Bank feeds, categorisation and shared household budgets, built from scratch to the client’s spec. No base to clone here, so this one was designed end to end.
Read the build~5 months saved
Omar Yassaa · MyQif Technologies~$250k engineering cost avoided
Omar Yassaa · MyQif TechnologiesRevolut Clone - a multi-currency neobank
Accounts, cards, FX and transfers on our neobank base, taken through the client’s first external audit. Sequenced country by country rather than launched everywhere at once.
Read the build~7 months ahead of plan
Ho Pei Aik · Youlife Tecnologia Dell'Informazione S.R.LPassed first external audit with no major finding
Ho Pei Aik · Youlife Tecnologia Dell'Informazione S.R.LA few proven bases, deployed thousands of times.
This is how 9,000 projects is possible at all. Across the eighty-four documented here, thirteen super-apps run on one base and six ride-hailing platforms on another. The same libraries carry the rest of the portfolio. Click a family to filter.
The eighty-four we can show you.
Documented case studies with a named client and a published testimonial. Thousands more projects sit behind NDAs or predate our current write-up standard. Filter by solution family; each row opens the case study.
AeygoGojek Clone2021
AFAfrostardomCameo Clone2025
Annurax ExchangeBinance Clone2024
AoneUber Clone2022
AppforanyGojek Clone2021
ARArbab App - IndriverInDriver Clone2024
Bharat Eat ModsUberEats Clone2021
BLBlue Silent Exchange - GMXGMX Clone2025
BLBlue Silent Exchange - SpotBinance Clone2025
BNBinGreeceAirbnb Clone2022
BOBook Boats NowGetMyBoat Clone2025
BRC20Binance Clone2024
caninordUber Clone2021
CACarrSyncCustom build2025
Click2DeliverUberEats Clone2021
COCoachs OnlineCustom build2024
DEDermacianPracto Clone2025
DEDermacian WebsiteCustom build2025
DODocttaPracto Clone2025
DODopeNetworkNetflix Clone2024
EasyCryptoLandBinance Clone2024
FLFloaters On demandThumbtack Clone2025
FloRideTuro Clone2023
FRFreeBoardCustom build2025
GoToRawandaAirbnb Clone2023
GUGUS - ChatGPTChatGPT Clone2025
GUGUS - DeepSeekDeepSeek Clone2025
INIntercopyCustom build2024
Intercopy ShareCustom build2024
INIntercopy WHMCSCustom build2025
Ischia BookingAirbnb Clone2024
IzzipayRevolut Clone2025
juvidoeon.comGojek Clone2023
KEKenuba Astro Phase 2Custom build2025
LeeftGojek Clone2021
LoveshotsNetflix Clone2021
MakaaluGojek Clone2021
Maxx Proxy ManagerCustom build2021
Mega ChickenUberEats Clone2022
MooveUber Clone2021
MyDocPharmaPracto Clone2025
MyQif (QifQif)Custom build2024
MYMyRidiGojek Clone2021
NelmeetZoom Clone2023
NelstreamYouTube Clone2023
OdientCameo Clone2024
ONOnlyAlphasOnlyFans Clone2025
ooiviooCameo Clone2023
OROrcaBridgeBinance Clone2025
OrcaReserveRevolut Clone2025
OtoKabUber Clone2022
PEPeter LuNeobank Solution2024
PIPixxieOnlyFans Clone2025
POPolyVibe (RelayBe)OnlyFans Clone2025
PragPlayNetflix Clone2022
RenidoZillow Clone2021
RYRykeNeobank Solution2024
Saas Home ServicesThumbtack Clone2021
SabisuappGojek Clone2022
SamePlaceFacebook Clone2024
SEServer ProGuardCustom build2024
ServicaThumbtack Clone2024
SHShophyGojek Clone2024
SpeedyvenGojek Clone2023
SuberoneGojek Clone2022
TATalokitoko (Izi Technologies)Glovo Clone2024
tbtrdUber Clone2021
TelcminingCustom build2023
TITick SocialTikTok Clone2025
TOTower UniversityNetflix Clone2025
TRTruxfinderUpwork Clone2025
UBUbanBankNeobank Solution2024
UBUbanLC - Revolut CloneRevolut Clone2025
URUrview NetflixNetflix Clone2024
VickiaCustom build2024
WAWalkBudUber Clone2025
Wave AppInDriver Clone2024
WEWellyanshPracto Clone2025
WhizzxbookBinance Clone2023
WoojekGojek Clone2021
XtremeJekGojek Clone2021
YOpidoGojek Clonepre-2021
Z-gigGojek Clone2021
ZycloneUber Clone2021Nothing in that family.
The custom track
Built from nothing, for names you know.
The eighty-four above run on a proven base, which is what makes six working days possible. A second body of work sits beside it: platforms built from the data model up, where no base existed and the window is two to eight weeks. Five of those are documented here.
These were delivered before our current write-up standard and have been rebuilt from the engagement record. No client testimonial and no client-reported figure exists for any of them, so none is shown. What each one describes is the brief, the constraints, and what was built against them.
Thirty-five sectors, one delivery standard.
Twenty-five have a dedicated sector page covering what ships ready-made, what needs building, and the regulatory shape of the vertical.
Eighty-four write-ups, out of thousands of builds.
Read the bars as case studies published, not as output. Miracuves has delivered 9,000+ projects since 2010 and published 3,900+ apps. The eighty-four below are the ones with a named client and permission to show the work.
The gap is wide and worth stating plainly: in 2025 we delivered 240 projects and wrote up twenty-seven of them, roughly one in nine. Through 2010 to 2020 the run rate was higher still, 450 to 750 a year, when the work was smaller and mostly bespoke. What changed is not the volume of delivery but how much of it is documented.
The bars skew recent because the write-up standard is recent, not because the work is. 2024 and 2025 hold forty-nine of the eighty-four.
Case studies published per year - 2025 shows 27 of 240 delivered
Why the curve bends upward
Early work was mostly bespoke: each build started closer to a blank page, so fewer of them are worth writing up as a repeatable story - one bespoke build teaches you little about the next. As the platform library matured, the same bases started carrying more products, which is what makes a build worth documenting: thirteen super-apps and six ride-hailing platforms sit on shared bases in the documented set alone.
That is also why the delivery window shortened rather than the team growing. Reuse compounds; headcount does not.
Clients who came back for a second and third build.
The most useful signal on this page. A first engagement can be luck; a second is a verdict. Ten of the eighty-four documented clients returned, three of them for a third platform - and repeat business is a large share of the 9,000 we do not write up.
Ready-made, or genuinely custom.
We will tell you which one you need during scoping, including when the answer costs us the larger project.
| Ready-made platform | Custom build | |
|---|---|---|
| When it fits | The mechanics already exist and proven | Something about the problem is genuinely new |
| Platform live | 6 working days | Built from the data model up |
| Total window | 6 working days, our build time | 2 to 8 weeks |
| Where the work goes | Branding, rails, integrations, compliance | Architecture, domain logic, everything |
| In the documented set | 71 of the 84 case studies | 13 of the 84 case studies |
| Source code | Transferred | Transferred |
Six working days ready-made. Two to eight weeks custom.
The platform is running inside six working days because the ledger, dispatch, catalogue or matching engine already exists. What follows is the part that is genuinely yours.
If a scope does not fit the ready-made base we say so before you commit and quote it as a custom build, rather than you discovering it in month four. That is a scoping decision, not a surprise.
The six working days are our build time, not a calendar promise. You supply the hosting and domain, a verified developer account we publish from, your branding and business details, an onboarded payment gateway with KYC complete, and any third-party API keys. Store review and merchant onboarding are controlled by Apple, Google and your payment provider, so those sit outside our window. Every figure on this page is defined on the facts page.
What you hold when we are done.
The same on all eighty-four. This is the part most portfolios leave out.
Eighty-four clients on the record.
Every case study on this page carries a testimonial from the client behind it, published with their name. We document what we can name; the rest stays private.
We had a licence sitting idle and every quote we pulled came back six figures on a nine-month timeline. Miracuves had a matching engine, settlement and the trading surface already built, so we spent our time on branding, the on-ramp and our reward token instead of on order books.
Booking, brief capture, the recording queue and creator payouts came ready. We localised the brief templates and added a mobile-money payout mix for our region. We launched with eighty creators onboarded on day one, and it looks like our platform rather than a US template.
The bank-link and aggregation layer is six months of pain if you build it. Miracuves already had it, so we added our categorisation model and the QIF export on top. Live in under a month and we reckon it saved us a quarter of engineering and around $250k.
Read all eighty-four testimonials → · Every number, defined →
The questions that decide this.
The honest answers, including the one about what you pay for when a base already exists.
If the platform already exists, what am I paying for?
The part that is yours. Local payment rails, the compliance surface your regulator wants, the integrations your business already runs on, and the flows your customers actually use. On a ready-made build that is most of the six days, and on a custom build most of the two to eight weeks. Either way it is where the value sits.
Will my product look like everyone else's?
No. The base supplies mechanics, not identity. Thirteen of the builds on this page run on the same super-app base and none of them looks alike, because branding, flows and every customer-facing screen are built for the product.
Do I own the code?
Yes, on all eighty-four. The repository transfers to your account with deployment documentation and architecture notes. It is not a licence and it is not held against a support contract.
How is six working days realistic?
Because the hard parts are already built and proven. The six days are our build time on a ready-made base: we white-label it, deploy it to your hosting and publish the apps to your own developer accounts. If your scope genuinely does not fit that base, we say so during scoping and quote it as a custom build at two to eight weeks, rather than you finding out halfway through.
Can I speak to one of these clients?
Yes. Tell us which build resembles yours and we will ask that client for permission and introduce you directly.
Why are there no revenue figures on this page?
Because they belong to the client. Every figure here is either their own published statement with their name against it, or an engineering fact we can point to. Where a commercial number is not ours to publish, we offer the introduction instead.
Get Started
Your App Could Be the Next Case Study
90+ readymade clone solutions deployed in 6 days, starting at $2,799. Custom builds from $6,699. 3,900+ apps delivered — source code handed over on every one.
