Dedicated Hiring · Available This Week

Hire Dedicated
Technical ArchitectsVetted by Miracuves · Embedded in Your Engineering Org

Add a senior technical architect to your team — vetted on distributed systems, cloud architecture, and migration planning. Full-time or part-time, direct access, replacement guaranteed. Miracuves vets dedicated technical architect candidates through skills assessment, paid trial, and reference checks — then embeds them in your repositories with weekly demos and direct access.

98% Rejection Rate NDA Day One 40hr/Week Dedicated 2-Week Replacement
Clutch Reviewed 4.9★·From $1,499/mo·View reviews →
AK

Senior Solution Architect

10+ yrs · Cloud · Microservices · Full-Time Available

97% Match
System Design
97%
Cloud Arch
95%
Microservices
92%
Security Arch
89%
Data Arch
86%
AWSKubernetesEvent-DrivenDDDMigration
Available to start within 48 hours
Talent Matching EngineLIVE
Pool Size65+ Vetted Technical Architects
Vetting Pass Rate2% (98% Rejected)
Avg. Match Time< 48 Hours
Replacement SLA2 Weeks, No Cost
10+ Yrs AvgArchitecture depth
Cloud NativeAWS · Azure · GCP
40 Hrs/WeekYour systems only
<72 HrsAgreement to start
Direct AccessSlack · no relay

98% Rejection Rate

Only the top 2% pass vetting

40hr/Week Dedicated

Only your product, full focus

NDA Day One

Signed before details shared

Direct Access

No account manager relay

Weekly Demos

Working output every Friday

Flexible Exit

2 weeks notice, no lock-in

More than 3,900+ Companies Trust us Worldwide
What This Role Does

What a dedicated technical architect does inside your engineering org

This is not a PowerPoint consultant who disappears after the diagram. A Miracuves dedicated technical architect embeds in your delivery — your RFC process, your architecture reviews, your migration programs. They make decisions that survive contact with production. Miracuves matches for production delivery inside your toolchain — repositories, ceremonies, and review standards — not parallel vendor silos that require chase-down for every update. You keep product ownership; we supply vetted capacity that commits under your definition of done.

Every architect passes a system design review on scaling and failure scenarios before matching. You select from leaders who have led real re-platforms — not theorists who have never owned an on-call rotation. Miracuves staff augmentation is not the right fit when you need a single logo on a slide deck with no repository access, when compliance requires employees on your payroll only, or when the role is purely executive coaching without hands-on delivery. In those cases we say so upfront and can recommend a full build engagement via our software development or clone solutions catalog instead. Compare sibling hire models and full-build options in the related section below.

Authors ADRs and RFCs that engineering teams actually reference during builds
Reviews designs for scalability, security, and operability before code is written
Plans migrations with phased cutovers — not big-bang rewrites that never finish
Mentors senior engineers on tradeoff thinking without becoming a approval bottleneck
Delivers an architecture health review every sprint with prioritized remediation

From a recent engagement — monolith decomposition

"Our board wanted microservices but our team had never run more than one deployable. Miracuves matched an architect who defined bounded contexts, shipped the first three services in eight weeks, and stayed through the full migration."

Miracuves Architecture Practice · May 2026 · Read Reviews →
your-platform — Architecture Sprint Board

To Do 2

Event schema registry design

Feat

Est: 3 pts

Multi-region failover RFC

Feat

Est: 3 pts

In Progress 2

Order service extraction

Feat

Assigned: TM · Day 2

API gateway policy review

Qa

Assigned: TM · Day 2

Done 3

Monolith dependency map

Qa

Closed: Done

ADR-014 caching strategy

Feat

Closed: Done

SLO definition workshop

Qa

Closed: Done

What's Included

Every engagement includes this — no add-on tiers

01

Your Architecture Repos

ADRs, diagrams, and RFCs authored in your systems from day one — not external slide decks.

02

Weekly Architecture Review

Every Friday, decisions, trade-offs, and migration progress reviewed live with engineering leads.

03

NDA + IP Assignment Day One

Bilateral NDA signed before any detail is discussed. All architecture artifacts belong to you.

04

Async-First Communication

Daily written updates via Slack regardless of timezone, plus live sync during your guaranteed overlap window.

05

Technical Governance

Standards, PR review cadence, and cross-team alignment — accountable delivery, not advisory-only.

06

2-Week Replacement Guarantee

If the architect isn't the right fit within the first 2 weeks, Miracuves replaces at no additional cost.

Honest Comparison

Miracuves vs Toptal, Turing, and Upwork — an honest comparison

Marketplaces optimise for transaction volume. Miracuves optimises for embedded delivery accountability — published rates, vetting you can verify, and a replacement guarantee if the match fails. Use this table when stakeholders ask why not Toptal, Turing, or Upwork — we answer plainly because the wrong engagement model wastes quarters. Procurement teams use it to compare IP ownership, overlap hours, and who remains accountable when delivery slips — not just hourly rate on a spreadsheet.

FactorMiracuvesToptal-classTuring-classUpwork / direct
Vetting depth98% rejection + paid trial sprintTop 3% claimAI-matched poolYou screen alone
Who owns deliveryMiracuves accountableMarketplace escrowPlatform SLA variesYour HR + eng
Pricing transparencyPublished monthly ratesQuote after briefQuote after briefSalary + benefits
IP & code ownership100% yours, your reposTypically yoursTypically yoursEmployee
Replacement guarantee2 weeks, no extra costLimited windowVaries by planRe-hire cycle
Timezone overlap4+ hrs confirmed in writingOften optionalOften optionalLocal only
Best forEmbedded product deliveryOne-off expert tasksScale fast, less vettingLong-term core team
How to choose: Marketplaces excel at one-off expert tasks. Miracuves fits when you need embedded accountability — someone in your repo, your sprint, your timezone — with replacement if the match fails. For full product builds without staffing, see our 90+ solutions and vertical pages.
Market Context

Why teams hire dedicated technical architects through Miracuves

Specialist talent for technical architects is hard to hire locally — and mis-hires cost quarters. Miracuves matches vetted practitioners who embed in your tools and delivery workflow, own outcomes under your governance, and stay accountable through a written engagement — not anonymous marketplace transactions. Every hire page cross-links to Miracuves technology, vertical, and clone catalogs so you can compare staffing versus full product delivery with one vendor. Use these benchmarks when writing your internal role spec — salary bands, trial scope, and toolchain expectations — so Miracuves can match profiles that fit your governance.

$412B
Enterprise Software
Teams embed architects when migration complexity exceeds staff capacity. Miracuves sees this pattern in discovery calls when teams compare embedded hire versus marketplace or agency models — and when procurement asks for named practitioners instead of anonymous resume pools.
IDC 2024
71%
Architecture Debt
Leaders citing undocumented decisions as scaling risk. Miracuves sees this pattern in discovery calls when teams compare embedded hire versus marketplace or agency models — and when procurement asks for named practitioners instead of anonymous resume pools.
ThoughtWorks 2024
2.5×
Faster ADR Cadence
Embedded architects vs rotating consultants on platform programs. Miracuves sees this pattern in discovery calls when teams compare embedded hire versus marketplace or agency models — and when procurement asks for named practitioners instead of anonymous resume pools.
Miracuves architect cohort 2024
63%
Want Embedded Architects
Over SI-only architecture engagements for product orgs. Miracuves sees this pattern in discovery calls when teams compare embedded hire versus marketplace or agency models — and when procurement asks for named practitioners instead of anonymous resume pools.
Gartner 2024
48h
Median RFC Access
From NDA to architect authoring in your repos. Miracuves sees this pattern in discovery calls when teams compare embedded hire versus marketplace or agency models — and when procurement asks for named practitioners instead of anonymous resume pools.
Miracuves operations 2025
2%
Vetting Pass Rate
After trade-off exercise and ADR review. Miracuves sees this pattern in discovery calls when teams compare embedded hire versus marketplace or agency models — and when procurement asks for named practitioners instead of anonymous resume pools.
Miracuves talent funnel 2025
Vetting Standards

How Miracuves vets every technical architect

Before a team member is shown to any client, they pass seven specific competency checks.

System design — capacity planning, failure domains, consistency modelsDesign
Cloud architecture — multi-AZ, cost optimization, managed vs self-hostedCloud
Distributed systems — messaging, sagas, idempotency, observabilityDistributed
Security architecture — zero trust, secrets, blast radius containmentSecurity
Data architecture — OLTP vs OLAP, CDC, schema evolutionData
Migration — strangler fig, dual-write, rollback planningMigration
Communication — RFC clarity, stakeholder alignment, mentoring judgmentComms
100
Applicants
Initial applications received
50
Screened
Role-fit screening call
20
Skills Test
Live skills assessment
8
Reviewed
Portfolio / work sample audit
4
Culture
Communication & fit
2
Pass
Paid trial sprint — final gate
01

Role Screening

45-min call — depth of experience, project context, problem framing.

02

Skills Assessment

Role-specific exercise solved live or via structured work sample.

03

Work Review

Senior Miracuves lead audits prior deliverables — not verbal claims.

04

Reference Check

Prior client or manager reference where applicable.

05

Culture & Comms

Clarity, responsiveness, ambiguous-requirement handling.

06

Paid Trial Sprint

Short paid trial on a real anonymized brief. The final 2% filter.

Tools & Methods

What your technical architect already knows

No tooling onboarding. They show up fluent.

AWS
Core cloud patterns
Azure
Enterprise workloads
GCP
Data & ML infra
Kubernetes
Container orchestration
Terraform
IaC standards
Kafka
Event streaming
GraphQL
API federation
PostgreSQL
Relational design
Redis
Caching strategy
Prometheus
SLO monitoring
GitHub
RFC workflow
Notion
ADR repository
Slack
Design reviews
Docker
Service packaging
Istio
Service mesh
Zoom
Architecture guild
Team Structures

Four ways to structure your architecture function

Start with one principal architect or add platform and security architecture capacity as complexity grows. Miracuves documents which practitioners join your squad, overlap hours, escalation path, and replacement SLA in the engagement letter — whether you embed individuals, a multi-role pod, or fractional leadership alongside delivery.

AK

Solo

Single Dedicated Architect

One principal architect owning standards and reviews. Best with strong engineering managers.

Best for: Scale-ups post-PMF

AK
BE
QA

Duo

Arch + Platform

Solution architect paired with platform engineer for paved-road delivery.

Best for: Teams adopting microservices

PM
AK
AK
BE
QA

Pod

Architecture Guild

Lead architect, security architect, and data architect for enterprise programs.

Best for: Regulated multi-product orgs

AK
+
+

Flexible

Migration Lead

Add architecture capacity for acquisitions, cloud moves, or re-platforms.

Best for: Transformation windows

Onboarding

From signed NDA to first architecture decision

Most clients have a matched architect authoring ADRs in your repos within 48 hours of agreement. Miracuves confirms practitioner names, overlap hours, rate structure, and replacement SLA in your engagement letter before anyone receives tool access — not verbal promises after you have paused the roadmap waiting on paperwork.

01

Day 0 — Brief & NDA

You share system context, constraints, migration goals, and team topology. NDA before architecture docs. Escalation paths and access scope are documented at each phase — not assumed from a generic vendor onboarding deck.

02

Day 1–2 — Shortlist & interview

Architect profiles with ADR history and live trade-off exercise. Direct access for your engineering leads. Escalation paths and access scope are documented at each phase — not assumed from a generic vendor onboarding deck.

03

Day 2–3 — Governance onboarding

RFC cadence, review forums, and documentation repos agreed. First architecture decision targeted. Escalation paths and access scope are documented at each phase — not assumed from a generic vendor onboarding deck.

04

Week 1 — First architecture review

Decisions, trade-offs, and migration progress reviewed live with engineering. Escalation paths and access scope are documented at each phase — not assumed from a generic vendor onboarding deck.

05

Ongoing — Scale or exit

Add squad capacity or fractional CTO under the same counterparty. Escalation paths and access scope are documented at each phase — not assumed from a generic vendor onboarding deck.

First 72 Hours

What happens after you say yes

01

NDA & systems brief

Constraints, migration goals, and team topology captured.

02

Architect shortlist

ADR history and live trade-off exercise candidates.

03

RFC cadence live

First architecture decision targeted in week one.

Full Catalog

Build with Miracuves — staffing or full product delivery

Not sure staffing is the right model? Miracuves also ships complete products from 90+ clone bases and custom builds — same company, same NDA, same IP ownership. Many clients start with a dedicated technical architect, then expand into a squad or switch to a vertical clone deployment when scope clarifies. Every hire page links to published technology stacks, vertical clone deployments, and sibling engagement models so stakeholders compare staffing versus turnkey product delivery under one NDA counterparty.

Transparent Pricing

What hiring a dedicated technical architect costs

Published rates. No request-a-quote wall.

Part-Time

$1,499/mo

20 hrs/week · ongoing support

  • 20 hours per week dedicated
  • ADR & architecture repo access
  • Weekly architecture review
  • NDA signed before start
  • 2-week replacement guarantee
  • Cancel with 2 weeks notice
Start Part-Time
Most Popular

Full-Time

$3,299/mo

40 hrs/week · full architecture focus

  • 40 hours, fully dedicated
  • 4+ hour timezone overlap
  • Cross-team technical governance
  • Embedded in engineering org
  • 2-week replacement guarantee
  • Cancel with 2 weeks notice
Start Full-Time

Architecture Guild

Custom

3–5 people · scaling

  • Architect + senior engineers
  • Migration program ownership
  • Standards & RFC cadence
  • Scales for platform rebuilds
  • Direct access to squad
  • Cancel with 2 weeks notice
Get Team Quote
Why we publish rates: Hidden pricing wastes time. If your needs require a different structure, we say so plainly.

What affects your monthly rate

Rates stay fixed for the agreed structure unless scope changes materially — Miracuves documents any rate adjustment before it takes effect.

Typical engagement structures

Part-time ($1,499/mo): 20 hrs/week for maintenance or advisory.
Full-time: published rate on this page · 40 hrs/week embedded.
Squad: custom quote for 3–5 roles with delivery lead.
Every engagement is month-to-month with two weeks' notice unless you request annual terms for rate lock.

Client Reference

What hiring a dedicated technical architect looks like in practice

A logistics platform hit scaling limits — deploy times over an hour, database locks during peak season, and no documented architecture after three years of fast growth.

01

Challenge

Monolithic codebase, unclear service boundaries, and peak-season revenue at risk without a credible scaling plan.

02

What Miracuves Delivered

Principal architect matched in 60 hours, dependency map and migration RFC in week one, first extracted service in production by week six.

03

Outcome

Deploy time dropped 78%. Architect remained full-time for fifteen months guiding the full decomposition program.

60 HrsTo start
6 WeeksFirst service live
78%Faster deploys
View All Reviews →

Client Testimonial

We needed someone who could draw the map and help us walk it — not another consultant deck. Miracuves sent an architect who paired with our team, made hard calls on boundaries, and shipped real services.

MB

M.B., VP Engineering

Logistics Platform · Series C

Engagement Brief

TypeFull-Time Dedicated
Time to start60 hours
First service6 weeks
Tenure15 months (ongoing)
ReplacementNone requested
Client Reviews

What clients say about Miracuves Hire Technical Architects

Verified on Clutch and Google — staffing and squad engagements where Miracuves remained accountable for delivery quality, not just resume forwarding. Clutch reviews below reference specific delivery outcomes — overlap hours, replacement speed, and how practitioners embedded in client repositories — not generic praise.

★★★★★

Clutch · SaaS

"Strangler migration from monolith to services — ADRs in our Confluence from week one. No external slide deck consultants disappearing after workshop week."

IA

I.A., CTO

Sweden

Microservices
★★★★★

Google · Logistics

"Event-driven boundary design cut our dispatch latency 40%. Architect attended every engineering lead sync for eight weeks."

VK

V.K., Head of Engineering

India

Architecture
★★★★★

Clutch · Media

"Multi-region AWS topology documented and implemented with our DevOps team. Handoff package included runbooks — not just diagrams."

NC

N.C., Director of Technology

Australia

Cloud
4.9 / 5.0Clutch average rating
4.8 / 5.0Google average rating
Top DeveloperClutch 2024–2025
Read All Reviews →
Frequently Asked

Questions about hiring from Miracuves

How is a Miracuves technical architect different from a Big Four architecture assessment?

Assessment decks do not ship migrations. Miracuves architects embed with your engineering org — writing RFCs, reviewing PRs, prototyping risky integrations, and mentoring leads while code moves. Vetting includes bounded-context exercises and phased migration planning on realistic codebases. You get accountable technical leadership, not a PDF that gathers dust.

Are architects advisory-only, or do they write code and review pull requests?

Senior matches are hands-on. They prototype critical paths, participate in architecture review boards, and hold the bar on PRs that affect system boundaries — not slide-only consultants who avoid repositories. Profiles that cannot demonstrate recent shipping context in vetting are rejected. Miracuves confirms structure, rate, timezone overlap, and IP assignment in your engagement letter before start — not verbal promises after you have paused the roadmap.

Do you cover AWS, Azure, GCP, and microservices migration patterns?

Cloud platform experience is matched to your stack. Vetting covers distributed system tradeoffs — consistency models, event-driven boundaries, observability, and phased strangler migrations — not buzzword checklists. State your current monolith or multi-service context during matching so shortlisted profiles reflect production-relevant depth.

We already have senior engineers. Why add an external architect?

Architects fill cross-system ownership gaps when no internal lead has bandwidth across services, data platforms, and third-party integrations. They mentor existing staff, document decisions in ADRs your team retains, and accelerate migrations that stall when everyone is feature-bound. The role is elevation and coherence — not a parallel shadow org.

Can an architect engagement start part-time for RFC review before a platform rebuild?

Yes. Part-time at $1,499/mo covers 20 hours per week — common for pre-scale audits, due diligence, or RFC review before committing to a full-time architecture lead. Scope and deliverables are agreed in writing so part-time does not become vague 'office hours' without output. Miracuves confirms structure, rate, timezone overlap, and IP assignment in your engagement letter before start — not verbal promises after you have paused the roadmap.

How do architects work with product and security stakeholders?

They translate technical constraints into roadmap implications product can prioritize, and partner with security on threat models without blocking delivery arbitrarily. Communication clarity in ambiguous requirements is a vetting criterion — architects who cannot explain tradeoffs to non-engineers do not pass. Miracuves confirms structure, rate, timezone overlap, and IP assignment in your engagement letter before start — not verbal promises after you have paused the roadmap.

What if architecture recommendations do not fit our team's execution capacity?

The 2-week replacement guarantee applies if the match is wrong. Miracuves can also adjust engagement scope — part-time advisory vs full-time program ownership — before you commit further. Month-to-month terms avoid trapping you with an architect whose style does not match your culture. Miracuves confirms structure, rate, timezone overlap, and IP assignment in your engagement letter before start — not verbal promises after you have paused the roadmap.

Who owns architecture documents, diagrams, and prototype code?

Your organization retains all artifacts. RFCs, diagrams, and spike code live in your repos and wiki under signed IP assignment. Handoff is designed so internal teams can maintain decisions after engagement — not dependency on a consultant's proprietary framework. Miracuves confirms structure, rate, timezone overlap, and IP assignment in your engagement letter before start — not verbal promises after you have paused the roadmap.

Get Started

Ready to add a dedicated technical architect?

Share your current architecture, scaling pain, and migration goals. Miracuves confirms seniority, overlap, and rate before commitment. Share stack, timezone, and first sprint goal — Miracuves responds with matched profiles, published rates, and bilateral NDA for review within one business day.

65+Vetted architects
<72 HrsTypical match time
98%Rejection rate
2 WeeksReplacement
WhatsApp — Start Now Request a Technical Architect

NDA signed before we discuss your project

Page reviewed by Miracuves Architecture Practice · Last updated June 2026 · Clutch & Google Reviews