Available Now · 90+ Readymade Solutions

GraphQL API Development Company

Schema-FirstAPI-ReadyFast

Miracuves is an enterprise GraphQL API development company. We build production-grade GraphQL APIs schema-first, with Apollo Federation where your domains need it, in 2-8 weeks - and our 90+ ready-made platforms launch in 6 working days. Full source code ownership, with the IP assigned to you from day one.

★★★★★ Clutch reviewed 5.0Ready-made platforms from $2,199View live deployments

  • 9,000+ Delivered
  • 500+ APIs Deployed
  • 100% Source Ownership
  • NDA Day One
6 daysReady-made platform delivery
$2,199Ready-made platform, from
90+Clone solutions
100%IP assignment
GraphQL developers active right now
GraphQLApollo FederationDataLoaderPrisma9,000+ deliveredNDA day one
  • GraphQL · REST · WebSocketUnify any backend protocol
  • 500+ APIsDeployed by Miracuves
  • DataLoader · PrismaOur enforced data access standard
  • 6 DaysReady-made platform, brief to live
  • 100% Source CodeDelivered to you on handoff
  • Schema-First Design

    Type-safe from day one

  • NDA Day One

    IP protected first call

  • Full Source Code

    Delivered at handoff

  • 60-Day Support

    Post-launch included

  • 100% IP Ownership

    Yours - always

  • Clutch Reviewed 5.0★

    Third-party verified

More than 6,000+ Companies Trust us Worldwide
In short

Miracuves builds GraphQL APIs for product teams whose web, mobile and partner apps need one typed contract over many data sources: schema design, resolvers with DataLoader batching, field-level auth, caching, persisted queries and Apollo Federation, often in front of the REST services you already run. A custom GraphQL API takes 2-8 weeks; our 90+ ready-made platforms launch in 6 working days. You own 100% of the source code.

Our GraphQL Approach

How Miracuves delivers GraphQL APIs - from 500+ shipped projects of real experience

After shipping 500+ API projects and deploying production GraphQL layers across fintech, logistics, e-commerce, and SaaS, Miracuves has a specific way of building GraphQL services. We start from schema-first design with Apollo Federation, not from a blank Express server.

GraphQL's type system and declarative data fetching eliminate over-fetching and under-fetching at the protocol level. For companies consolidating multiple microservices behind a unified API, this means one GraphQL gateway replaces dozens of REST endpoints - with built-in documentation, type safety, and real-time subscription support.

Who this service is for: Startups and product teams building data-intensive applications who need faster frontend development, reduced payload sizes, and a single API contract across web, mobile, and third-party consumers. Miracuves GraphQL development fits when you have multiple data sources to unify, need real-time data via subscriptions, or want to eliminate REST endpoint proliferation. If your API surface is extremely simple (3-5 endpoints with no aggregation), REST may be the simpler choice - we will tell you honestly.

  • Schema-first design enforced: every project starts with the type definitions, not the resolvers
  • Apollo Federation architecture: compose multiple sub-graphs into one unified gateway
  • DataLoader pattern for N+1 elimination: batching and caching at the query level
  • Real-time subscriptions via graphql-ws: live data push for dashboards, chat, tracking
  • GraphQL Codegen for type-safe resolvers: TypeScript types generated from your schema
9,000+Projects delivered since 2010
3,900+Apps published by Miracuves
90+Ready-made solutions to start from
6 daysReady-made clone delivery
2-8wMiracuves custom GraphQL build timelines
100%Source code ownership
REST APIsMigration ready
Real-TimeSubscriptions
FederationDistributed schema

Why GraphQL at Miracuves

  • Custom GraphQL API2-8 weeks
  • Data fetchingClients select only the fields they render
  • Architecture patternSchema-first · Federation
  • Ready-made platforms90+ to start from
  • Real-time supportSubscriptions via WebSocket
  • Source code ownership100% yours
Example engagement: Logistics platform, 14 days
"Real-time tracking dashboard, multi-tenant data isolation, federated schema across 4 microservices - for a logistics startup consolidating shipment data from 3 legacy systems - in 14 days. We used Apollo Federation to compose the sub-graphs, added DataLoader for batching, and deployed with AWS ECS Fargate. Delivered day 14."

Technology Comparison

GraphQL vs REST vs tRPC - the right choice for your API

Teams that only build REST tend to call GraphQL overkill, and GraphQL specialists tend to call REST outdated. Miracuves builds all three styles and answers honestly - the API style you pick decides how clients fetch data, how responses are cached and who can change the contract later.

MetricFive things that decide cost, speed and reach
Miracuves default for multi-client APIs

GraphQL

Apollo Server or Yoga + DataLoader

REST

OpenAPI + HTTP caching

tRPC

TypeScript end to end

01Query flexibility
Client-defined queriesEach screen selects only the fields it renders - no over-fetching
Fixed endpointsOver- and under-fetching are common as clients multiply
Procedure callsTyped inputs and outputs, shaped by the server
02Type safety
Schema-first + codegenTyped clients generated for web and mobile from one schema
Via OpenAPI + codegenOnly as strict as the spec is kept up to date
End-to-end typesInferred from server code - TypeScript clients only
03Caching
Requires setupNormalized client cache, DataLoader, persisted queries over GET for the CDN
HTTP caching to CDNPlain GET semantics any cache understands
TanStack Query on the clientGET queries can be HTTP-cached too
04Federation
Apollo FederationMany teams own sub-graphs behind one endpoint
API gateway neededRouting and aggregation live in the gateway or a BFF
Not designed for itOne codebase, one team
05Best for
Composite APIs, federation, real-timeWeb, mobile and partner apps on one contract
Simple CRUD, public APIsThird-party integrations, webhooks, file transfer
Full-stack TypeScript monolithsOne team owning both client and server
Choose GraphQL if…

You need a unified API layer across multiple microservices · real-time subscriptions (live dashboards, GPS tracking, chat) · frontend teams that need independent data flexibility · a schema-first contract that eliminates back-and-forth between web and mobile teams.

Consider an alternative if…

Your project is a simple CRUD API with low data complexity - REST may be faster to ship. Full-stack TypeScript monolith where types flow end-to-end - tRPC could be a better fit. A GraphQL API generated straight from an existing PostgreSQL database, with little custom logic - Hasura, a GraphQL engine rather than an alternative to GraphQL, may suit you. Talk to our team →

GraphQL guide

What to know before you hire a GraphQL API development company

The questions buyers ask us before a GraphQL project starts - what the build includes, how it fits over the REST services you already run, which server to use, and when GraphQL is the wrong tool.

What does a GraphQL API build include?

A GraphQL build is more than a schema file. The schema is the contract your web, mobile and partner apps code against, so we design it first, with your frontend leads, from the screens they need to render rather than from your database tables. Then come the parts that decide whether the graph survives real traffic:

  • Resolvers with DataLoader batching, so a list of 50 orders does not fire 50 separate customer lookups (the N+1 problem)
  • Authorization at field level, not only at the endpoint, because one query can reach a user's email, invoices and admin flags at once
  • Caching in three places: the client's normalized cache, per-request DataLoader caches and server response caching driven by cache hints
  • Persisted queries or a trusted-document allowlist, so production accepts only the operations your apps actually ship
  • Query depth and cost limits, plus Apollo Federation when several teams or services own parts of the graph

Can GraphQL sit in front of our existing REST services, and how long does frontend onboarding take?

Yes, and it is the most common way our GraphQL projects start. Each field resolves by calling a REST endpoint you already run, either in resolver code or declaratively with directive-based tools such as Apollo Connectors or GraphQL Mesh. Your REST services keep serving their current clients while screens move over one at a time.

Onboarding is short because a REST-backed field is just another field to the frontend: it appears in the schema explorer, the generated TypeScript types and the docs as soon as it is published. A team already on GraphQL can usually query it the same day; a team new to GraphQL needs a few days to set up the client, codegen and caching. The one new habit: a slow or failing REST endpoint now surfaces as a slow field or a partial response with an errors array, so we document timeouts and nullability field by field.

How does GraphQL work with a headless CMS such as Prismic?

Several headless CMSs expose content over GraphQL. Prismic, for example, offers a read-only GraphQL endpoint alongside its REST API, and its GraphQL queries go out as GET requests so a CDN can cache them. That suits content pages well: a Next.js page or a mobile screen asks for exactly the slices and fields it renders.

The harder job is joining CMS content with your own data - a product page that needs marketing copy from the CMS, price and stock from your commerce service and reviews from a third party. We put one GraphQL layer in front of all three, so the client sends a single query and the CMS stays the editors' tool rather than your public API. Writes and content migrations still go through the CMS's own APIs, since its GraphQL endpoint is read-only.

Apollo Server or another GraphQL server?

Apollo Server is our default on Node.js for its federation support, plugin model and large community; GraphQL Yoga is a lighter alternative we also use. The server does not have to be Node.js. Mature GraphQL libraries exist for most backend languages - Spring for GraphQL and Netflix DGS on Java, Strawberry on Python, gqlgen on Go, Hot Chocolate on .NET - so the graph can live beside your existing codebase instead of in a new one.

For a federated graph the router matters more than the server. Apollo's router and GraphOS platform keep some enterprise features on paid plans, while open-source gateways such as Hive Gateway and WunderGraph Cosmo also implement the Federation spec. We compare licensing and hosting cost for your case before choosing, and sub-graphs written to the spec are not tied to one router.

When is REST the better fit than GraphQL?

When one client calls a handful of fixed endpoints, GraphQL adds a schema, a server and a caching strategy you do not need. REST also wins for public APIs that third parties integrate with from OpenAPI docs, for file upload and download, for webhooks, and for responses you want any CDN to cache with plain HTTP rules. If that describes your project, our API development team builds it as REST with OpenAPI, and we will tell you so on the first call.

If the real problem is splitting a monolith into independently deployed services, start with microservices development; a federated GraphQL layer can become the front door once those services exist.

What should you ask before you hire Apollo GraphQL developers?

Ask how they stop N+1 queries, where authorization lives, and what happens when a client sends a query nested ten levels deep. A developer who says auth belongs "at the gateway", or has never set a query cost limit, ships a graph that passes the demo and falls over under a real client. Ask to see a schema they evolved without breaking a released mobile app - fields deprecated with a reason, never silently deleted - and how schema changes are checked in CI before merge.

One senior GraphQL developer covers the server; a production graph also needs someone on the database, the schema checks and load testing. Miracuves assigns that team as a fixed-scope custom build or on a retainer from $2,299/month, with an NDA from day one and the code, schema and runbooks handed over as yours.

Schema-First Architecture

GraphQL architecture powered by Apollo Federation

These are the specific decisions our GraphQL team makes on every API project - choices that determine whether a backend scales cleanly across services or becomes a data-fetching maze that needs to be rewritten.

  • 01

    Architecture - Federated Sub-graphs, Unified Gateway

    Apollo Federation arranges each domain (users, orders, inventory) as an independent sub-graph with its own type definitions and resolvers. A federation router - Apollo Router, or the older Apollo Gateway - composes them into one unified schema. This means your frontend team sees one endpoint. The backend team deploys sub-graphs independently. Adding a new sub-graph means recomposing the supergraph, not redeploying the other sub-graphs.

  • 02

    Data - DataLoader Eliminates N+1 Queries

    DataLoader batches every database call that resolves within a single client request and caches results per request lifetime. The most common problem inherited from backend teams new to GraphQL: resolvers that fire one SQL query per parent row, creating N+1 waterfalls that destroy API performance. Miracuves wires a DataLoader into every resolver that fetches by key on day one, and a query-count test fails the build if a list field starts issuing one query per row.

  • 03

    Real-time - Subscriptions over WebSocket

    GraphQL subscriptions push real-time events to clients over WebSocket using the graphql-ws protocol. Live tracking dashboards, chat systems, order status updates - each subscription maps to a pub/sub channel backed by Redis. Miracuves benchmarks every subscription setup under load before going live. Development benchmarks are never used as production reference.

What most API agencies get wrong

Delivering without DataLoader. No schema registry. Missing subscription auth. Hardcoded API keys in source. No query depth limiting or cost analysis. Miracuves has inherited GraphQL APIs with every one of these - and adding cost limits or field auth after mobile apps depend on the schema always takes longer than starting with them.

schema.graphql -- Logistics Platform
# Federated schema composed by the router from 4 sub-graphsextend type Query {            shipment(id: ID!): Shipmenttracking(ref: String!): TrackingEventfleet: [Vehicle!]!            }            extend type Subscription {            locationUpdate(shipmentId: ID!): GPSstatusChange(shipmentId: ID!): ShipmentStatus            }            type Shipment @key(fields: "id") {            id: ID!            origin: Address!            destination: Address!            status: ShipmentStatus!            eta: DateTimedriver: Driver            price: Float!            }            enum ShipmentStatus {            PENDING ASSIGNED IN_TRANSIT DELIVERED EXCEPTION            }            # DataLoader batches DB calls per requesttype Driver @key(fields: "id") {            id: ID!            name: String!            vehicle: Vehiclerating: Float            }

Our Service Models

Three ways Miracuves delivers your GraphQL project

Every GraphQL engagement is with Miracuves as a company - schema design, resolvers, database and QA covered by one team, with a defined process and full delivery accountability. Choose the model that matches your project stage.

ESSENTIAL
Customer app
Partner app
Admin
Single GraphQL API

GraphQL Basic

Single GraphQL API with schema-first design, 3-5 data sources, standard resolvers, basic caching, and Apollo Server deployment. Ideal for startups and MVPs.

  • Single federated or monolith GraphQL schema
  • Apollo Server + DataLoader
  • GraphQL Codegen for TypeScript types
  • PostgreSQL + Prisma integration
  • Basic authentication (JWT)
  • graphql-ws subscription support
  • Dockerized deployment
  • 14 days delivery
RouterAccountsOrdersInventoryDataLoaderPostgreSQLRedis
Apollo Federation

GraphQL Business

Federated GraphQL architecture with up to 5 sub-graphs, Apollo Gateway, advanced DataLoader patterns, real-time subscriptions, and CI/CD pipeline. For growing products.

  • Apollo Federation with 3-5 sub-graphs
  • Apollo Gateway + Schema Registry
  • Redis caching + pub/sub for subscriptions
  • GraphQL Codegen + ESLint + Prettier
  • Docker Compose + CI/CD (GitHub Actions)
  • OAuth 2.0 / SSO integration
  • Grafana + Prometheus monitoring
  • 21 days delivery
Wk 1
Wk 2
Wk 3
Wk 4
Multi-Team Federation

GraphQL Enterprise

Multi-team federated GraphQL platform with unlimited sub-graphs, custom schema registry, advanced security policies, rate limiting, and dedicated architecture support.

  • Unlimited sub-graphs + custom federation
  • Apollo GraphOS enterprise features
  • Advanced rate limiting + cost analysis
  • Custom middleware + auth policies
  • Multi-region deployment (AWS ECS)
  • On-call support + SLAs
  • Dedicated GraphQL Architect
  • 45 days delivery

Quality Standards

How Miracuves ensures every GraphQL delivery meets production standard

Every GraphQL project passes through Miracuves' quality gates before handoff - schema, resolvers and query limits are all checked, as a delivery standard applied to every graph we ship rather than a checklist ticked at the end.

  • Clean layering - schema / resolvers / data sources separatedArchitecture
  • DataLoader pattern - no N+1 queries in resolversData
  • Apollo Federation - compose distributed sub-graphsArchitecture
  • Endpoint QA - tested against real API consumersQA
  • CI/CD pipeline - automated builds and tests from day oneDevOps
  • No secrets in source - API keys in environment config onlySecurity
  • API-ready - schema linting, security audit, deployment passedDelivery

Enforced QA Gates

Our 6 Continuous Delivery Gateways

Every line of code, schema type, and resolver must successfully clear all six quality control gates before repository handoff.

01

Schema Review on Every Pull Request

Every schema change merged into your main branch is reviewed by a senior GraphQL architect. No untested type definition reaches your production API under any circumstances.

02

Resolver Unit Tests Required

Unit tests for every resolver covering success, error, and edge cases. DataLoader batch functions tested in isolation. Minimum coverage enforced before any release build.

03

Integration Suite Against Staging

End-to-end GraphQL query tests against a staging environment. Every query, mutation, and subscription defined in the schema must pass before deployment.

04

Load Testing with Artillery

Resolver response times, DataLoader batch efficiency, and subscription scalability are profiled under simulated peak traffic. Numbers from a developer laptop are never accepted as production figures.

05

Security Audit - OWASP API Top 10

Query depth limiting, cost analysis, rate limiting, auth bypass testing, and injection prevention. Every GraphQL API is hardened against OWASP API Top 10 vulnerabilities.

06

Post-Launch Monitoring - 60-Day Active Support

Grafana and Prometheus configured pre-launch. Miracuves watches per-field resolver latency and error rates during the 60-day post-launch support window, so a slow field is found from the dashboards before a client reports it.

Technology Stack

The GraphQL stack Miracuves ships with

Matched to your existing services, your language and whether the graph is one server or a federated supergraph - not a one-size-fits-all default.

Apollo ServerGraphQL runtime with federation support
GraphQL YogaCross-platform GraphQL server
TypeGraphQLType-first schema definition
Prisma ORMDatabase access layer
PostgreSQLPrimary database
RedisCaching and pub/sub
SR
graphql-wsWebSocket subscriptions
JWT/OAuth 2.0Authentication layer
DataLoaderN+1 batching and caching
GraphQL CodegenType-safe code generation
Docker + ComposeContainerization
AWS ECS/FargateCloud deployment
Apollo GraphOS StudioSchema registry and tracing
ESLint + PrettierCode quality enforcement
GitHub ActionsCI/CD pipeline
Grafana + PrometheusMonitoring and alerting

Our Process

From brief to deployed GraphQL API - what happens and when

Every GraphQL engagement follows the same delivery spine - whether it is a single GraphQL API over one database or a custom federated schema across several services. At every step you know which types and resolvers Miracuves is building, which data sources and credentials you need to provide, and what gets delivered. Timelines below reflect our standard sprint; custom builds run milestone-based with the same checkpoints.

  1. Step 01

    Discover

    Understand data sources, user stories, API consumers, and federation requirements

  2. Step 02

    Schema Design

    Define type definitions, relationships, resolvers structure, and federation boundaries

  3. Step 03

    Build

    Implement resolvers, DataLoader, subscriptions, auth middleware, and integration tests

  4. Step 04

    Test

    Resolver unit tests, integration suite, load testing, schema diff checks, and security audit

  5. Step 05

    Deploy

    Containerized deployment, DB migration, CI/CD pipeline, monitoring setup, and go-live

  6. Step 06

    Iterate

    Monitor resolver performance, iterate on schema, add sub-graphs, and scale as needed

Same DayNDA turnaround
14-45 DaysAPI delivery sprint
24 HoursFirst commit after scope
60 DaysPost-launch support

Six days is Miracuves build time, not calendar time

The six days are ours, and they do not run past six. What can add time sits on your side: developer account verification, merchant onboarding and compliance approvals are controlled by the app stores and your payment provider, not by us. We list exactly what you need ready on the first call so you can start those in parallel.

See what you provideFACT-005, audited quarterly

Transparent Pricing

What GraphQL API development costs at Miracuves

We publish prices for GraphQL work because the cost drivers - sub-graphs, subscriptions, integrations - can be scoped up front. No "contact us for pricing" pages. No hidden fees after scope is agreed.

Readymade Clone

$2,199 from

Fixed price · 6 day delivery · scoped

  • Ready-made platform from our 90+ catalogue
  • Web app, admin panel and mobile apps
  • Branding and white-label applied
  • A GraphQL layer on top is custom work, quoted separately
  • Full source code - 100% yours
  • 60-day post-launch support
Start a Clone Project
Most Requested

Custom GraphQL Build

$3,699 from

Scoped per project · depends on the work · milestone billing

  • Full GraphQL team - API engineer + backend + QA
  • Apollo Federation architecture
  • Weekly sprint demos - working resolvers
  • Performance and security audit included
  • Full source code - complete IP transfer
  • Milestone billing - no pay before delivery
Get a Scope & Quote

Ongoing Development

$2,299 /mo

Monthly retainer · cancel with 2 weeks notice

  • Miracuves team assigned to your product
  • New features, releases, and maintenance
  • Weekly demos and sprint planning
  • Direct communication - no relay
  • Scales up or down as needed
  • All code remains 100% yours
Discuss Ongoing Work

Why Miracuves publishes pricesClients who understand cost upfront make better product decisions, such as starting with one GraphQL server and federating later. If your graph requires a larger budget, Miracuves will explain exactly which sub-graphs or integrations drive it - not simply charge more.

What affects GraphQL project cost at Miracuves

Ready-made platform pricing stays fixed when your scope matches the catalogue product. Custom GraphQL builds scale with: number of sub-graphs (one service vs. federated), real-time subscription complexity, integration depth with existing systems, multi-region deployment requirements, and custom resolver logic beyond standard CRUD patterns.

Typical GraphQL budget ranges

  • Ready-made platformfrom $2,1996 days
  • Custom GraphQL API workfrom $3,699depending on the work
  • Custom GraphQL build (federated)$8,000-$25,0002-8 weeks depending on scope
  • Ongoing retainerfrom $2,299/month for feature work and maintenance

Every quote is written before payment - no surprise invoices after kickoff.

Example engagement

What a typical GraphQL project looks like at Miracuves

An illustrative example of a typical project of this kind, with client details anonymized. Figures show what this kind of build targets, not a named client's results.

A mid-size logistics company managing 50,000+ daily shipments across 4 regions needed to consolidate their REST API architecture into a unified GraphQL layer - without disrupting live operations or rebuilding their microservices from scratch.

  1. 01

    The Challenge

    The existing REST architecture had 30+ endpoints with no type safety. Frontend teams building real-time tracking dashboards, driver mobile apps, and customer portals each needed different data shapes - causing massive over-fetching, N+1 waterfalls, and weeks of backend changes per frontend feature.

  2. 02

    What Miracuves Delivered

    Designed a federated GraphQL layer with 4 sub-graphs (shipments, fleet, customers, pricing) composed behind an Apollo Gateway. The frontend tracking dashboard now fetches shipment status, driver GPS, and ETA in one query. DataLoader eliminated 95% of N+1 database calls. WebSocket subscriptions push real-time location updates.

  3. 03

    Outcome

    GraphQL migration completed in 14 days without any REST API downtime. Data over-fetching reduced by 60%. Frontend feature delivery accelerated 3x. The logistics company expanded to 5 new cities using the same federated schema with zero backend changes.

60%Less over-fetching
3xFaster frontend delivery
14dFull delivery
View All Case Studies
Project Brief
  • Solution usedApollo Federation + Node.js + PostgreSQL
  • Delivery timeline14 days
  • Sub-graphs built4 (shipments, fleet, customers, pricing)
  • Key integrationsApollo Gateway · DataLoader · Redis · WebSocket
  • ComplianceBuilt to SOC 2 and GDPR controls; certification is the client's audit
  • Source code100% client-owned
50K+Daily shipments tracked
4.9★Client satisfaction
60dSupport included

Client Reviews

What clients say about building with Miracuves

Named clients, in their own words, on backends Miracuves built with them - billing engines, alert pipelines and payment systems. Each card names the product; read every testimonial on our client testimonials page.

Client testimonial
"Miracuves's MXBilling base gave us the billing engine, the dunning workflow, and the customer portal. We added our meter-ingestion adapters, our regional tax rules, and a custom multi-tenant reporting layer. We went from kickoff to our first operator live in 11 weeks. The platform has been running for two billing cycles with no major incidents - exactly the reliability profile we needed."
JC
Jemell CottonCTO, Global Utility Systems Ltd
Billing SaaS with customer portal, built on MXBilling
Client testimonial
"Multi-tenant structure, alert pipelines and agent collectors were the slow part and they already existed. We added our scoring engine, the playbook library and billing. First customers were onboarded within weeks and the dashboard is now a sales tool rather than an internal screen."
RK
Rohit KhannaFounder & CEO, Server ProGuard Inc
Multi-tenant security dashboard, built on MXSecurity Dashboard
Client testimonial
"Miracuves's MXB2B base gave us the catalogue, the order flow, and the payments backbone. We added our custom short-term-credit module, our distributor-tier pricing, and a custom reconciliation engine. From kickoff to first 100 active retailers was 9 weeks. Our credit portfolio is now a real product line, not a spreadsheet."
RP
Rajesh PremaniFounder, Vyapar Pe Technologies
B2B commerce and payments platform, built on MXB2B
5.0 / 5.0Clutch average · 14 reviews
4.8 / 5.0Google average rating
Top DeveloperClutch recognition · 2024-2025
Read All Reviews

Why Miracuves

Six places to check us before you ever call us

Each one is either run by someone else or open to anyone. Check them in any order; the whole list takes about a minute.

Why clients choose Miracuves

Three promises we would stake the company on

Every promise on this site rests on these three. Each one is something you can check, not something you have to take on trust.

  • 01People you can name

    Our leadership is public, with real LinkedIn profiles, not a stock-photo team page. A named team works your build and sends you progress on WhatsApp every working day.

    Meet the leadership
  • 02Proof over promises

    Every number we publish, pricing, timelines, project counts, is defined and sourced on a public facts ledger. If we can't back a claim, we don't make it.

    Read the facts ledger
  • 03A process with a deadline

    Ready-made platforms go from kickoff to live deployment in 6 working days, guaranteed: miss it for reasons on our side and we work free until launch. Custom builds get a fixed quote after a free feasibility study.

    Get a feasibility study

Related Services

Also building with these technologies at Miracuves

A backend rarely ships alone: it needs a front end, a mobile app or an admin panel, and a place to run. These are the services clients most often add.

Frequently Asked

Questions about GraphQL development at Miracuves

Something not covered here? Ask on WhatsApp and you will usually have an answer within two hours.

Ask us directly
What is GraphQL and why should my project use it?

GraphQL is a query language for APIs that lets clients request exactly the data they need. Unlike REST where each endpoint returns a fixed structure, GraphQL exposes a single endpoint and the client specifies which fields it wants. This eliminates over-fetching, under-fetching, and reduces the number of round trips. For projects with multiple data sources or diverse client applications (web, mobile, IoT), GraphQL provides a unified API layer that accelerates frontend development.

How much does GraphQL API development cost with Miracuves?

A ready-made platform from our catalogue - web app, admin panel and mobile apps - starts from $2,199 and launches in 6 working days. Custom GraphQL API work starts from $3,699, depending on the work. A custom federated GraphQL build typically runs $8,000-$25,000 and takes 2-8 weeks depending on scope: the number of sub-graphs, real-time subscription complexity, integration depth with existing systems, multi-region deployment and custom resolver logic beyond standard CRUD decide where it lands. Ongoing GraphQL work is available from $2,299/month for feature work and maintenance. Every project includes full source code ownership and 60 days of post-launch support. Every quote is written before payment, with no surprise invoices after kickoff.

What is Apollo Federation and when do I need it?

Apollo Federation is a GraphQL architecture pattern where multiple microservices each own a sub-graph (a portion of the schema) and an Apollo Gateway composes them into a single unified schema. You need federation when your API spans multiple domains (e.g., users, orders, inventory) and different teams own different services. It allows each team to deploy independently while exposing one consistent GraphQL endpoint to clients.

How long does it take to build a GraphQL API?

A single GraphQL API with 3-5 data sources typically takes 14 days from discovery to deployment. Federated architectures with multiple sub-graphs range from 21 to 45 days depending on complexity. Miracuves delivers in that window because we start from our own tested building blocks for authentication, cursor pagination, file upload and subscriptions rather than writing them from scratch. If you need a whole product rather than an API, our 90+ ready-made platforms launch in 6 working days.

Can Miracuves migrate my existing REST API to GraphQL?

Yes, Miracuves specializes in REST-to-GraphQL migration. We analyze your existing REST endpoints, identify data shapes consumed by each client, and design a GraphQL schema that wraps or replaces the REST layer. The migration can be incremental - GraphQL and REST can coexist during the transition. We use schema stitching or Apollo Federation to compose your legacy REST endpoints as GraphQL sub-graphs, allowing a phased migration with zero downtime.

What tech stack do you use for GraphQL development?

Miracuves builds GraphQL APIs on Node.js with TypeScript. Our standard stack includes Apollo Server or GraphQL Yoga for the runtime, Prisma ORM for database access, PostgreSQL as the primary database, Redis for caching and pub/sub, DataLoader for N+1 elimination, and graphql-ws for WebSocket subscriptions. We use GraphQL Codegen for type-safe resolvers, Docker for containerization, GitHub Actions for CI/CD, and Grafana + Prometheus for monitoring. For federated architectures, we use Apollo Router (or Apollo Gateway) with the Apollo Federation specification.

Do you offer ongoing support after the GraphQL API is deployed?

Yes, every Miracuves GraphQL project includes 60 days of post-launch support. This covers bug fixes, schema adjustments, performance tuning, and deployment issues. Enterprise plans include on-call support with defined SLAs. We also provide documentation for your GraphQL API, including schema documentation, resolver architecture, and deployment runbooks. Extended support and maintenance retainers are available.

How do you handle authentication and authorization in GraphQL?

We implement JWT-based authentication for most projects, with optional OAuth 2.0 / SSO integration for enterprise clients. Authorization is handled at the resolver level using a permission middleware pattern. We also implement query depth limiting, cost analysis, and rate limiting to prevent abusive queries. For federated architectures, the router validates the token and forwards it, or the verified claims, to each sub-graph in request headers; each sub-graph still enforces its own field-level rules. All implementations follow OWASP API Top 10 security guidelines.

Do you build GraphQL APIs for companies in Denmark and the rest of Europe?

Yes. Miracuves is based in Mumbai and delivers remotely to clients worldwide, including Denmark and the rest of Europe; we have no local office there. Projects run in English. Our hours, Mon-Sat 10:00-19:00 IST, overlap the European morning, and the first response comes in under 2 hours within them, so schema reviews and sprint demos are booked inside that overlap. An NDA is signed before you share any project detail.

What is the expected onboarding time for frontend teams to use REST-backed GraphQL fields?

Usually hours to a few days, not weeks. A field backed by a REST endpoint - written as a resolver or added declaratively with a directive - looks like any other field in the schema, so it shows up in the explorer, the generated types and the docs as soon as it is published. Teams already on GraphQL can use it the day it ships; teams new to GraphQL need a few days to set up the client, codegen and caching. We also document each field's latency and failure behavior, since a REST outage surfaces as a null field with an error rather than a failed page.

Can we hire dedicated Apollo GraphQL developers from Miracuves?

Yes, as a team rather than a lone contractor. On the ongoing development retainer, from $2,299/month, a Miracuves team is assigned to your graph for new features, schema changes and maintenance, with weekly demos, sprint planning and direct communication. The team scales up or down as needed, the retainer can be cancelled with 2 weeks notice, and all code remains 100% yours.

Get Started

Ready to build your GraphQL API with Miracuves?

Tell Miracuves which clients and data sources your GraphQL API has to serve. We will confirm the right starting point, service model and delivery timeline - in writing, before any commitment is required from you.

9,000+Projects delivered
2-8 WeeksCustom GraphQL API delivery
100%Source code yours
Same DayNDA turnaround
Book a Free ConsultationContact & Brief Form

NDA signed before we discuss your project details

Page reviewed by the Miracuves GraphQL Development Team · Last updated May 2026 · Clutch & Google Reviews

Disclaimer

Miracuves is an independent software development company. We are not affiliated with, connected to, sponsored by, or endorsed by any of the brands or platforms named on this page.

Why these names

Names of the form “Brand Clone” are used descriptively. It is how the software industry refers to building a platform with functionality comparable to a known service, and how clients search for it.

Who built this

The entire design and codebase of our products is built by our own team. Our products contain no code, design, graphics, or content originating from any third-party website or application.

Trademarks

All third-party names and marks listed on this page are the property of their respective owners, referenced solely to describe the category of software offered.