X Clone App - White-Label Social Platform Built on Paid, Verified Accounts

It is the same platform at the same price, and we would rather say that plainly than invent a difference. X is what Twitter is called now, so these are not two products. What differs is which half of the build each page leads with, and that follows what people searching each name actually want. The Twitter Clone page is written for the buyer asking how the network makes money from advertisers and developers, so it leads with the typed ad campaign engine and the scoped API platform. This page is written for the buyer whose plan is to charge members, so it leads with tiers, verification, creator subscriptions and tips. Both surfaces exist in both deployments. Tell us which half your business starts with and we configure accordingly.

No. Miracuves is an independent software company, and this platform has no affiliation, connection, sponsorship or endorsement from X or Twitter. The name appears here descriptively, because it is both how the software industry names this category of product and the phrase buyers actually search for. Nothing in the codebase, the design, the graphics or the content came from the X or Twitter website or applications.

$3,399, once, as a fixed figure rather than an opening one. That buys the web application, the Flutter application, the API layer, the operator console, the Firestore rules and indexes, and six working days of branded deployment. Nothing is charged per seat, no revenue share applies, and we take no percentage of what your members pay you. Costs move only when you add integration work: connecting a payment processor beyond the referenced Stripe setup, creator payout operations, automated moderation, a media pipeline, an iOS submission or localization for a particular market.

Three tiers ship: Free, Premium at $9.99 and Pro at $29.99. The important part is where they are enforced. The plan sits on the member record and entitlement checks run on the server before a gated action executes, so a member cannot unlock a paid feature by editing a request or by using a modified client. Because the gating is server-side rather than compiled into the interface, changing what a tier costs or what it includes is an operator decision rather than a deployment. Charging for those tiers needs a payment processor wired, which is integration work rather than something switched on out of the box.

Verification is granted rather than detected. A request enters a review queue in the operator console, an administrator approves it, and the badge is written to the member record with a reason recorded and an audit entry naming who did it. Every client reads the same state, so the badge appears consistently on web and mobile. Because it is a workflow you control rather than a flag in a database, you decide what earns it, and you can attach it to a paid tier or price it on its own. That is what makes it worth something to a member.

Yes, and it is the half of the product most clone scripts never build. Reports land in a queue as records to work rather than as mail to read, and close through five graded actions: hide, unhide, delete, suspend and ban. Status changes carry a written reason, which is what gives an appeal something to actually examine. Behind all of it, privileged actions write an audit entry capturing the administrator, the action, the target account, post or report, the reason and the time. Sign-ins are recorded with IP, user agent, device, browser, location and outcome for disputes, and the console authenticates on a path of its own. Automatic classification of abusive content is an integration rather than a default, and we would rather state that than imply the software polices itself.

For the social experience and for entitlements, yes. The Flutter client covers 28 screens over the same REST surface at /api/v1/, so a tier, a badge or a block resolves identically whichever one a member opens. The operator console is deliberately absent from the app: reviewing a verification request or judging a report needs a screen with room for context, not a phone. Android ships with the build; an iOS build and its store submission is scoped separately.

Everything that runs. The Next.js application and its 68 pages and 190 components, the 64 API handlers, the Flutter client and its 28 screens, the fifteen console pages, the twelve Cloud Functions, and the Firestore rules, composite indexes and typed converters that hold it together. The transfer is outright, so extending it, rebranding it, sub-licensing it to a partner or handing the whole thing to a different development team are all decisions you make alone. Concretely, it also means nobody upstream can decide what your Premium tier costs.

Six working days to a branded platform running on your infrastructure, covering branding, configuration, your Firebase project, payment credentials and the Android build. It excludes anything scoped as an integration, so payment rails past the referenced setup, automated moderation and enterprise SSO sit outside it, as does App Store review, which nobody controls. Larger custom work runs two to eight weeks and gets quoted in writing before it starts.

Members, which is the answer that matters most and the one no vendor can sell you. After that: connecting a payment processor beyond the referenced Stripe setup, creator payout operations, automated content moderation, video transcoding and CDN delivery, live audio rooms, an iOS build and submission, enterprise SSO, and analytics deeper than the console’s own statistics are each scoped as separate work. The account record carries two-factor fields but does not enforce them, which matters most for the operator logins that can grant badges and ban people. And moving secrets out of environment variables into a managed store is a deployment step rather than a default.